Nation’s Oldest Taxpayer Group Warns Judiciary Committee: Beware of Predatory Online Tax-Collection SchemesFor Immediate Release November 30, 2011Pete Sepp, (703) 683-5700
(Washington,
DC) – Healthy tax competition among states and the future well-being of small
businesses are just two important benefits to our nation that would be
endangered by legislation empowering a new state-run tax-collection regime on
sales beyond their respective borders. Those are the words of caution the
362,000-member National Taxpayers Union (NTU) gave lawmakers today as a House
Judiciary Committee hearing explored whether Congress should enact proposals
that would force a business to collect state and local taxes on its “remote
sales” with consumers in potentially thousands of jurisdictions across the
United States.
“For
the sake of taxpayers, job creators, and our economy, Congress should avoid
giving the green light to predatory state tax cartels,” said NTU Executive Vice
President Pete Sepp.
The hearing will include discussions of
legislation known as the Main Street Fairness Act (MSFA) and the Marketplace
Fairness Act (MFA), both of which embrace concepts found in the Streamlined
Sales and Use Tax Agreement (SSUTA). NTU has objected to these plans on many
grounds. Contrary to proponents’ claims, Internet-based purchases are not
“tax-free.” Online sales involving a buyer and a seller in the same state are
subject to tax at purchase, as are “click and mortar” sales. Numerous tax
liabilities of other kinds are triggered in the course of these activities. As
with income taxes, the sales-tax collection costs under SSUTA would not simply
disappear through the existence of compliance software, and neither bill’s
small-seller exemption provides adequate protection from the problem.
Furthermore, e-commerce allows small firms to
thrive, by selling to a much wider market and by managing their own operations
more efficiently with online productivity tools. Equally important, SSUTA’s
multistate structure could encourage participating governments with lower sales
tax rates to “round up” their levels, thus depriving citizens of the tax
competition that has characterized the “laboratory of the states.” Though the MFA offers an advisory clause that higher revenues
from new collection obligations should be used to reduce tax rates, Sepp said
that “taxpayers can be forgiven for worrying that once the money starts filling
state and local coffers, it won’t be coming back.”
As
NTU has noted in previous communications, designing a truly revenue-neutral
system that shields small sellers from harsh compliance costs will take more
comprehensive protections and reforms than either the MFA or the MSFA could
possibly offer. One step to explore would be requiring all firms to collect sales
taxes only for the jurisdiction where they are based, rather than for
multitudes of governments around the country. Another would be passing
bicameral legislation (H. Res. 95 and S. Res. 309) that affirms Congress’
intent not to give states “the authority to impose any new burdensome or unfair
tax collecting requirements on small Internet businesses.” The bills are authored
by Representatives Lungren (R-CA) and Lofgren (D-CA), and Senators Wyden (D-OR)
and Ayotte (R-NH).
“Congress
should recognize that a vote for the so-called Main Street Fairness Act or the
Marketplace Fairness Act is a vote to trample on the very meaning of the words
‘Main Street,’ ‘Marketplace,’ and ‘Fairness,’” Sepp concluded. “The way to help
small businesses and their customers is by easing tax and regulatory burdens,
not giving states license to heap new ones on a struggling economy or dump the time-tested
principle of interstate tax competition.”
NTU is a nonpartisan, nonprofit citizen organization
founded in 1969 to work for lower taxes, limited government, and economic
freedom at all levels. The group was among the first to support the federal
Internet Access Tax Moratorium and oppose SSUTA. Note: For more on NTU’s work
in this public policy area, visit www.ntu.org.