Boehner’s Debt Ceiling Plan Fails “Cut, Cap, Balance” and Financial-Market Tests, Taxpayer Group Contends
(Alexandria, VA) – The 362,000-member National Taxpayers Union (NTU) stated today that House
Speaker John Boehner’s (R-OH) two-step plan to raise the debt ceiling not only fails
to adhere to the “Cut, Cap, and Balance” strategy House leaders have said they
support, it may deliver insufficient deficit reduction to prevent a downgrade
of America’s credit rating.
“The
language of the plan released last night does not, despite claims to the
contrary, adequately meet the principles laid out by the ‘Cut, Cap, and
Balance’ coalition, in which NTU has been a key participant, or the legislation
of the same name that has passed the House,” said Andrew Moylan, NTU’s Vice
President of Government Affairs.
As
Moylan noted, the short-term cuts envisioned in the Speaker’s plan amount to
only $6 billion next fiscal year, allowing for $24 billion more spending than
envisioned in the budget resolution drafted by Representative Paul Ryan (R-WI).
This is a far cry from the $111 billion in near-term reductions contained in
the House’s Cut, Cap, and Balance legislation.
Furthermore,
the Boehner proposal’s spending cap only applies to “discretionary” (i.e.,
non-entitlement) outlays and even then allows budget growth at half the rate of
inflation, rather than limiting expenditures as a percentage of the economy.
And while it does not contain any immediate tax increases, the committee it
establishes for the second phase of the plan contains no prohibition on tax
hikes and would leave taxpayers vulnerable to such burdens by limiting debate
and amendments on the floor.
“Perhaps
worst of all,” Moylan continued, “this package does nothing constructive to
advance the cause of passing a Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) to our
Constitution that would insulate taxpayers from Washington’s recklessness.” The
bill does require a vote on a BBA, but that is something the Speaker could
schedule largely whenever he chooses. Most importantly, the debt ceiling
increase is not contingent upon its passage.
The
whole purpose of the debt ceiling debate has been to achieve a course
correction that will allow the federal government to avoid the economic damage
of a downgrade. What should really terrify Members, according to Moylan, is the
very real prospect that even enactment of the Boehner plan, which may prove a
career-ender for lawmakers who promised bolder action, will not be enough to
fend off a downgrade in our nation’s credit rating this week. This is yet further evidence that the only plan written
in legislative text that can pass the House and maintain America’s AAA-rating
is the Cut, Cap, and Balance Act, which has been stymied by Senate Majority
Leader Harry Reid (D-NV).
“Harry
Reid said he didn’t want to ‘waste time’ on the Cut, Cap, and Balance Act,”
Moylan concluded. “It is now clear that the Senate instead is wasting its best
opportunity to solve the debt problem: passing the very same Cut, Cap, and
Balance legislation it was too quick in dismissing.”