The Good, The Bad, & The Rehashed: The President’s “Economic Address” Proposals Unlikely to Spur Job CreationFor Immediate Release September 12, 2011Douglas Kellogg, (703) 683-5700
Pete Sepp, (703) 683-5700
(Alexandria, VA) –
President Obama is pushing Congress to immediately pass the American Jobs Act
formally introduced in Congress today. But the 362,000-member National
Taxpayers Union (NTU) warns that despite some tax relief proposals and
overtures to free trade and regulatory reform, the President’s plan is filled
with rehashed spending schemes that offer little to warrant optimism on the job
front.
“Despite
some plans of near-term tax reductions for workers and businesses, the
President offered far fewer clues of specific long-term relief from what
remains a burdensome tax system,” said NTU Executive Vice President Pete Sepp,
“The vast spending proposals in the American Jobs Act, and the President’s
veiled threats to hike taxes on selected industries like oil and gas, would
lead to predictably ugly results for the U.S. economy.”
NTU’s assessment of
President Obama’s key proposals:
The Good (or at least
adequate)
- Cutting the payroll tax in half for the first $5 million in wages
- Temporarily eliminating employer payroll taxes on wages for new workers
or raises for existing workers up to $50 million
- Extending 100 percent expensing into 2012 (allowing firms to
immediately deduct equipment purchases)
- Passing several pending trade agreements
Much of the tax relief proposed by the President is already
in place. While letting the measures expire would quite likely cost the economy
more jobs, maintaining the status quo should not be expected to alter the
unemployment situation a great deal.
Passage of free trade agreements would indeed benefit the
economy, but taxpayers will be wary of Trade Adjustment Assistance programs
becoming part of the deal.
The Bad
- Transportation spending costing at least $50
billion
- Extending Unemployment Insurance for another
year costing $49 billion
- School repair and modernization at a cost of $30
billion
- Preventing teacher layoffs a price tag of $30
billion
- Project Rebuild, which would cost $15 billion,
would oddly fund the refurbishing of foreclosed homes and businesses
- Infrastructure Bank at a minimum cost of $10
billion
There were more spending proposals as well, adding up to a
whopping $202 billion. The Infrastructure Bank has the potential to be quite a
bit more expensive than its initial $10 billion price tag estimated by the
White House. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), who the President referred to as an
“Infrastructure Bank Champion” has legislation for such an institution
estimated to cost $25 billion over five years, according to the National
Taxpayers Union Foundation BillTally project.
Unemployment insurance, transportation “investments”, and
spending on teachers, are all old hat, tried in the stimulus of 2009 or other
efforts over recent years. Combining these proposals into one package is
unlikely to suddenly make them more effective.
The Rehashed
The ugly reality of the President’s long awaited speech was
that it featured mostly rehashed ideas. Whether a provision is in the good or
bad column, it is probably not a new idea, and it’s likely to have already been
tried in one form or another over the past two years.
Additionally, the President has no control over the Joint
Committee that he says he will call on to pay for everything in the bill in an
effort to avoid added debt. So further ballooning of the national debt may
result.
The President also rehashed his call for tax hikes on
politically convenient industries and individuals again. Such a move would
definitely cost American jobs, diverting the nation from the President’s stated
goal: job creation.
Taxpayers suffering under a weak (some say nonexistent)
recovery and a Tax Code in dire need of systemic reform, along with the more
than 9 percent of Americans looking for work, are unlikely to see much
improvement in an economy that has already failed to respond to past approaches
and variations of the proposals the President made last week.
The 362,000-member NTU is a nonpartisan,
nonprofit organization working for lower taxes, smaller government, and
economic freedom at all levels. More information on NTU’s work, is available at
www.ntu.org.