Press Releases
Printable Version |
Email to a friend
For Immediate Release Apr 30, 2004 For Further Information, Contact: Peter J. Sepp, Demian Brady, (703) 683-5700Study: Lawmakers Lament Deficits but Most Draft Bills to Boost Budget Higher(ALEXANDRIA, VA) -- As Congress completes
action on this year's budget resolution with deepening deficits in mind,
a new study from the National Taxpayers Union Foundation indicates lawmakers
haven't backed up their rhetoric with spending restraint. Just 16 Members
of Congress had net agendas to reduce spending, while 129 Representatives
and 23 Senators compiled net agendas to increase spending by over $100
billion.
"Taxpayers
heard many words from Congress last year about the budget deficit and the
mounting costs of military operations, but they saw very few legislative
proposals to meaningfully address either of these fiscal concerns," said
NTUF Senior Policy Analyst and BillTally study author Demian Brady. "Lawmakers
actually added to the pressure by introducing a record amount of spending
hikes across the board."
BillTally
is a cost accounting system that computes a net annual agenda for each
Member of Congress and has done so since 1991. The results are based on
each Member's individual sponsorship and cosponsorship of pending legislation.
The study offers a unique look at the fiscal behavior of lawmakers, free
from the influence of committees, party leaders, and rules surrounding
floor votes.
All
cost estimates for bills are obtained from third-party sources or calculated
from neutral data. Within the First Session 108th Congress
(2003), a large number of bills were identified as having a fiscal impact
of at least $1 million (856 in the House and 663 in the Senate). Among
the author's findings:
-
Under
GOP leadership, the lopsided ratio of spending increases to decreases has
tipped dangerously off balance at a record 26.6 to 1. When Republicans
first grasped power the ratio (nearly 9.6 to 1 in the 102nd Congress)
became more balanced (1.4 to 1 in the 104th Congress).
-
The
average House Democrat sponsored or cosponsored legislation that would
increase spending by a net $401.6 billion annually, over 13 times higher
than the average Republican ($30.7 billion). Both parties posted the highest
spending totals ever recorded by BillTally.
-
Senate
proposals for spending reductions were up from last session, but proposed
spending far outweighed them. The net annual agenda of the average Senate
Democrat weighed in at $174.1 billion -- the highest level since the 103rd
Congress.
The average Senate Republican net agenda reached an all-time record high
at $26.1 billion.
-
Just
13 Representatives had net agendas to reduce spending, while nearly one-third
of all House Members compiled net agendas to increase spending by greater
than $100 billion. Of these, 29 had net agendas to increase spending by
over a trillion dollars. In the Senate, only three members had net agendas
to reduce spending.
Although BillTally focuses on faulty fiscal
records in Congress, Brady also observed that President Bush has failed
to veto a single spending bill, even after his call for limiting 2003 appropriations
to four percent growth fell on deaf ears in Congress (actual growth was
12 percent).
"Both parties are compiling records that
would lead the nation toward bigger government," Brady concluded. "The
question is how fast will we get there -- or, even more important, will
enough Members of Congress step forward to apply the brake?"
NTUF is the research affiliate of the 350,000-member
National Taxpayers Union. NTUF Policy Paper 150, Operation
Enduring Deficits: Marshalling Taxpayer Dollars into New Programs is
available online at www.ntu.org.
-30- Related Links: |
|
|