NTU & NTUF

   SEARCH NTU


   SPECIAL FEATURES


How to Fight Property Taxes
Our price: $6.95











  Commentaries

 

  Printable Version  |      Email to a friend  

Army Ads and NASCAR: Racing Away with Your Money

by
Drew Johnson

Jul 16, 2003

When NASCAR fans pack the 20 racetracks to attend the 36 races that comprise the 2003 Winston Cup schedule, the tickets, parking, and t-shirts will not be the greatest costs assumed by those in attendance. Before the green flag ever falls at a single event, these, and all other American taxpayers will have already paid over $16 million for the "Army of One" sponsorship on a Winston Cup stock car.

That's right, American taxpayers dish out millions to purchase sponsorship for the United States Army in NASCAR's elite touring series.

By raiding its taxpayer-funded advertising budget to plaster decals on the quarter panels of an MB2 Motorsports Winston Cup Series entry, the Army hoped to speed off with 1,200 new recruits. The sponsorship forces taxpayers to subsidize much of the research, development, and manufacturing costs for the cars and engines, as well as employee salaries and operational expenses of MB2, a private for-profit enterprise. Thus, the race team is free to jockey for earnings through race purses and bonus funds with very few expenses left uncovered by the U.S. Army. Who are the recipients of this subsidy? The multi-millionaire owners of MB2 Motorsports led by investment banking firm principal and auto dealership magnate, Nelson Bowers.

The sponsorship intends to reach the sports-minded 17-24 year old male population, a main source of possible Army recruits. However, that prime demographic group constitutes less than 10 percent of NASCAR fans and viewers, meaning that relatively few of the Army's target audience will ever see the black and gold "Army of One" car in action.

Further limiting the potential for recruiting success is a severe lack of star power and on-track achievement by the drivers wearing the Army firesuit. MB2's regular driver Jerry Nadeau, currently sidelined with injuries sustained in a practice accident at Richmond International Raceway, has never finished higher than 17th in NASCAR's year-end point standings.& Mike Wallace, temporarily piloting the "01" car for the recovering Nadeau, boasts only two top-five finishes in a dozen years of Winston Cup racing. In all, Nadeau and Wallace possess a combined total of one victory in over 300 Series starts.

The Army's $16 million commitment is considered highly lucrative by Winston Cup Series standards and sponsorships of such magnitude generally fall to only the most highly successful, thus most recognizable and marketable drivers in the sport, not also-rans like Nadeau and Wallace.

For example, pharmaceutical maker Pfizer pays $12 million per year, far short of the cost of the Army's agreement, to sponsor the Jack Roush car of 33-time race winner Mark Martin. A $15 million yearly arrangement by United Parcel Service secured Robert Yates' entry driven by Dale Jarrett, whose resume boasts 30 Winston Cup race winsÑamong them, three Daytona 500 victoriesÑand the 1999 Winston Cup Championship. In NASCAR, where consistent finishes and frequent trips to victory lane translate into sponsor visibility and promotional success, it seems the Army found a dud of a race team rather than bang for its buck.

If the Army manages to reach its goal of signing 1,200 new soldiers resulting from its $16 million association with the MB2 NASCAR team, it will do so at the staggering cost of $13,333 per enrollee. Currently, the Army seeks to enlist over 70,000 new recruits. If the Army spent as much to reach each of the desired new enlistees as it will on those attracted by its NASCAR program, the cost would verge on $1 billion.

The Army recruiting budget, which includes advertising expenses, is set to increase $228 million in the upcoming fiscal year and Army brass claim that still more money is needed to satisfy its advertising needs. Congress must realize that it is not insufficient funding, but rather the imprudent way in which the Army spends its substantial taxpayer-provided advertising budget that limits its ability to reach potential recruits. It is time to wave a red flag over further Army attempts to recruit through wasteful methods at the expense of America's taxpayers.

Drew Johnson, the son of a former NASCAR series driver, is a Policy Analyst at the National Taxpayers Union, a non-partisan, citizen group dedicated to lower taxes, less wasteful spending, and the principles of rational and limited government. Readers may write to him at 108 N. Alfred St., Alexandria, VA 22314, or visit www.ntu.org.

  Printable Version
  Email to a friend

108 North Alfred St. Alexandria VA 22314 | Phone: 703.683.5700 | Fax: 703.683.5722 | E-mail: ntu@ntu.org      © 2009 National Taxpayers Union & NTUF. All rights reserved.