America's independent, non-partisan advocate for overburdened taxpayers.

 

Blog Contributors

Brandon Arnold
Vice President of Government Affairs 

Dan Barrett
Research and Outreach Manager 

Demian Brady
Director of Research 

Christina DiSomma
Communications Intern 

Timothy Howland
Creative Content Manager 

Curtis Kalin
Communications Intern 

Ross Kaminsky
Blog Contributor 

David Keating
Blog Contributor 

Douglas Kellogg
Communications Manager 

Sharon Koss
Government Affairs Intern 

Richard Lipman
Director of Development 

Joe Michalowski
Government Affairs Intern 

Diana Oprinescu
Communications Intern 

Austin Peters
Communications Intern 

Kristina Rasmussen
Blog Contributor 

Lee Schalk
State Government Affairs Manager 

Pete Sepp
Executive Vice President  

Nan Swift
Federal Government Affairs Manager 

College Football Playoff Act of 2011 - Taxpayer's Tab Supplement


Dan Barrett
January 12, 2012

This week's Taxpayer's Tab focused on H.R. 3638, Act for the 99%, which left us with some additional material that we're highlighting here.  This week's "Wildcard Bill" is H.R. 3696, the College Football Playoff Act of 2011.

The Bowl Championship Series is a collection of five college football bowl games for NCAA Division I Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) programs with the top two teams playing in a championship game.  The goal of the BCS, which began with the 1998 season, is to pit the two best FBS teams against each other in an attempt to avoid a split national championship.  The selection of the top two teams is based on a combination of computer algorithms and polls.  The winner of the championship game is recognized by the conferences that participate in the BCS as the BCS National Champion.  Despite tweaks to the system over the years, the BCS has not been without controversy. 

That controversy – the failure to produce a champion via a true playoff system – has lead Congressman Joe Barton (R-TX) to introduce H.R. 3696, College Football Playoff Act of 2011.  H.R. 3696 would make it unlawful to promote, market, or advertise any FBS game as a championship game unless the game is the result of a post-season, single elimination system.  The same prohibition would apply to any merchandising associated with a championship game.  The Federal Trade Commission would be charged with enforcing the legislation under its powers dealing unfair or deceptive advertising. 

The College Football Playoff Act is a regulatory measure and does not authorize any new spending. However, it is unclear how the act would affect FTC spending or how federal education spending might be affected by a change in college sports programs.

 


 

Comment on this blog

Nickname
Comment
Enter this word:

User Comments