America's independent, non-partisan advocate for overburdened taxpayers.

 

Blog Contributors

Brandon Arnold
Executive Vice President 

Dan Barrett
Research and Outreach Manager 

Melodie Bowler
Government Affairs Intern 

Demian Brady
Director of Research 

Christina DiSomma
Communications Intern 

Jihun Han
Communications Intern 

Timothy Howland
Creative Content Manager 

Samantha Jordan
Communications Intern 

Curtis Kalin
Communications Intern 

Ross Kaminsky
Blog Contributor 

David Keating
Blog Contributor 

Douglas Kellogg
Communications Manager 

Sharon Koss
Government Affairs Intern 

Michael Liguori
Government Affairs Intern 

Richard Lipman
Director of Development 

Joe Michalowski
Government Affairs Intern 

Diana Oprinescu
Communications Intern 

Austin Peters
Communications Intern 

Kristina Rasmussen
Blog Contributor 

Tax Reform According to Milton Friedman


Michael Tasselmyer
July 31, 2013

Today would have been the 101st birthday of renowned economist Milton Friedman, who has been recognized by his peers as one of the most influential figures in modern economic thought and received numerous awards and honors for his achievements, including the Nobel Prize and the Presidential Medal of Freedom. NTUF and our fellow policy analysts at the Tax Foundation will be commemorating his life and work by hosting an event tonight from 6-9 PM in downtown Washington, D.C. You can participate online and find out more by visiting our #Milton101 page here.

Friedman's contributions to economics and the ways in which we frame public policy discussions were numerous. But what did he have to say on the issue of tax reform?

As a founder of the Chicago school of economic theory, Friedman generally believed that less government intervention in the economy would lead to increased prosperity and growth. When applied to tax policy, this idea led him to an unequivocal determination: "I am in favor of cutting taxes under any circumstances and for any excuse, for any reason, whenever possible."

A crucial issue that Friedman found with the U.S. tax system (both then and now) was the sheer complexity of the code. He lamented the lack of incentive for those on either side of the aisle in Washington to simplify the complicated system of deductions and loopholes that we know today. Even though the video below was filmed in 1978, many of the problems Friedman discusses still apply to our modern debates.

Friedman has been noted as a prominent advocate of the "negative income tax," a system in which those who earn below a specific income threshold would receive a stipend from the government to make up a percentage of that difference. He contended that such a system would maintain a progressive bent -- one that would not unduly punish the less fortunate -- while doing so in a more efficient manner:

"[Friedman] was above all a pragmatist, and he emphasized the superiority of the negative income tax over conventional welfare programs on purely practical grounds. If the main problem of the poor is that they have too little money, he reasoned, the simplest and cheapest solution is to give them some more. He saw no advantage in hiring armies of bureaucrats to dispense food stamps, energy stamps, day care stamps and rent subsidies."

Friedman also made the case for a flat tax, most notably in his seminal 1962 work "Capitalism and Freedom". He stated in a 1996 article in the Wall Street Journal:

"All things considered, the personal income tax structure that seems to me best is a flat-rate tax on income above an exemption... I would combine this program with the abolition of the corporate income tax, and with the requirement that corporations be required to attribute their income to stockholders, and that stockholders be required to include such sums on their tax returns. The most important other desirable changes are the elimination of percentage depletion on oil and other raw materials, the elimination of tax exemption of interest on state and local securities, the elimination of special treatment of capital gains, the coordination of income, estate, and gift taxes, and the elimination of numerous deductions now allowed."

In a 1976 People magazine article in which he referred to the modern income tax system as an "unholy mess", Friedman contended that a flat tax would bring in enough revenue to allow for lower overall rates (which would benefit the less wealthy). A flat tax and fewer deductions, he said, would also eliminate the "tax shelter industry" that many high earners use to avoid paying certain taxes.

In both cases, Friedman was adamant that a vastly more efficient system would bring with it a significant economic boom. He favored simplicity over complexity while trying to combine fairness with effectiveness.


 

Comment on this blog

Nickname
Comment
Enter this word:

User Comments

Submitted by jono at: August 22, 2014
Thanks for the tips you are discussing on this web site. Another thing I want to say is the fact getting hold of some copies of your credit report in order to look at accuracy of any detail is the first action you have to carry out in credit repair. You are looking to thoroughly clean your credit history from harmful details problems that screw up your credit score.sbobet asia

Submitted by Anonymous at: August 16, 2014
Your page is sweet, your graphics are great, and what's more, you use videos that are relevant to what you're saying. You're definitely one in a million, man! learn Poker

Submitted by ONTIME at: August 3, 2013
Repeal the progressive tax, use a ballot drive national sales tax, defund the IRS, make use of term limits no retirement for all elected and appointed officials, end all government unions. These steps alone can begin the paring of government, stop the overspending, assure a accountable yearly budget, stop tax discrimination, social warfare, regain your representation and put the civil back into public service....We are wasting time and it is costing us time, money and freedom...

Submitted by bob at: August 2, 2013
Yes, a flat tax - NO exemption, all income to an individual or a corporation should be taxed. No deductions, no nothing, a flat tax of say 10%, (easy to calculate.) would eliminate half of the IRS, Many accountants and lawyers. It would be great to project that income. say 10% of GNP.