America's independent, non-partisan advocate for overburdened taxpayers.

 

Blog Contributors

Brandon Arnold
Vice President of Government Affairs 

Dan Barrett
Research and Outreach Manager 

Demian Brady
Director of Research 

Christina DiSomma
Communications Intern 

Timothy Howland
Creative Content Manager 

Curtis Kalin
Communications Intern 

Ross Kaminsky
Blog Contributor 

David Keating
Blog Contributor 

Douglas Kellogg
Communications Manager 

Sharon Koss
Government Affairs Intern 

Richard Lipman
Director of Development 

Joe Michalowski
Government Affairs Intern 

Diana Oprinescu
Communications Intern 

Austin Peters
Communications Intern 

Kristina Rasmussen
Blog Contributor 

Lee Schalk
State Government Affairs Manager 

Pete Sepp
Executive Vice President  

Nan Swift
Federal Government Affairs Manager 

Supreme Court Health Care Showdown: Roundup


Nan Swift
March 29, 2012

Yesterday was the final day for oral arguments in the individual mandate case before the Supreme Court.  Most experts are saying that we can expect a decision in late June, but there’s no reason to rest on our laurels until then.  Just because the Don’t Tread on Me flags are no longer waving in front of the court house doesn’t mean that we don’t need to continue to educate others about what is really in the President’s health care bill and to urge our legislators to repeal it.  Go here to learn how you can take action.

And check out some of the great articles below to see what others are saying about the last three days and what comes next:

Sheldon Richman, “Why the Health Insurance Mandate is Immoral and Unnecessary”

The argument, however, contains a fatal flaw. If the medical-insurance market would indeed fail without a mandate, it’s only because of other mandates the government has already imposed. Thus the government has created the rationale for an extension of its own power.

Anthony Fisher & Damon Root, “Obamacare #FAIL: Day 3 at the Supreme Court”

Washington Free Beacon, “Scalia Likens Reading Obamacare to Cruel and Unusual Punishment”

Politico.com, “Justices to Congress: Back to You”

Chicago Tribune, “Justices Suggest Medicaid Expansion is Unconstitutional”

The Wall Street Journal, “The ObamaCare Reckoning: Overturning the Whole Law Would be an Act of Judicial Restraint”

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Mr. Clement is asking the Court to conduct "a wrecking operation," before stating that "the more conservative approach would be salvage rather than throwing out everything." The Obama Administration didn't say exactly that, but it did argue that the mandate is indispensable to its supposedly well-oiled regulatory scheme and if it is thrown out the insurance rules should be too.

But Justice Anthony Kennedy doubted Justice Ginsburg's logic, since by taking out only the individual mandate the Court would in effect be creating a new law that Congress "did not provide for, did not consider." To wit, costs would soar without any mechanism to offset them.

"When you say judicial restraint," Justice Kennedy said, "you are echoing the earlier premise that it increases the judicial power if the judiciary strikes down other provisions of the act. I suggest to you it might be quite the opposite." Overturning the mandate alone, he continued, "can be argued at least to be a more extreme exercise of judicial power than to strike the whole."


 

Comment on this blog

Nickname
Comment
Enter this word:

User Comments

Submitted by Ron at: April 3, 2012
Can someone post taxes plus social security paid by income? I believe SS is a tax like any other.

Submitted by Floyd Looney at: March 29, 2012
Did the tart on SCOTUS really say this?? Kagan: "'The exact same argument so, so that really reduces to the question of: why is a big gift from the federal government a matter of coercion? "'In other words, the federal government is here saying: we’re giving you a boatload of money. There are no, is no matching funds requirement. There are no extraneous conditions attached to it. "'It’s just a boatload of federal money for you to take and spend on poor people’s healthcare. It doesn’t sound coercive to me, I have to tell you.'"