America's independent, non-partisan advocate for overburdened taxpayers.

 

Blog Contributors

Brandon Arnold
Executive Vice President 

Dan Barrett
Research and Outreach Manager 

Melodie Bowler
Government Affairs Intern 

Demian Brady
Director of Research 

Christina DiSomma
Communications Intern 

Jihun Han
Communications Intern 

Timothy Howland
Creative Content Manager 

Samantha Jordan
Communications Intern 

Curtis Kalin
Communications Intern 

Ross Kaminsky
Blog Contributor 

David Keating
Blog Contributor 

Douglas Kellogg
Communications Manager 

Sharon Koss
Government Affairs Intern 

Michael Liguori
Government Affairs Intern 

Richard Lipman
Director of Development 

Joe Michalowski
Government Affairs Intern 

Diana Oprinescu
Communications Intern 

Austin Peters
Communications Intern 

Kristina Rasmussen
Blog Contributor 

Payroll Tax Hike Highlights Hypocrisy of Refusal to Reform Entitlements



January 9, 2013

The Fiscal Cliff package ushered through Congress last week has left just about every taxpayer with a holiday hangover, thanks in large part to the temporary Social Security payroll tax cut that was not extended. Aside from any worthy debate over the wisdom of the two year relief on payroll tax rates, what the demise of this policy highlights is the absurdity of those in Washington who refuse to reform the entitlements that these taxes fund.

The end of the holiday, and shock of the payroll tax hike, makes clear the pain workers feel when they lose money from their paychecks. Particularly in the midst of a recession, even $50 a week can be sorely missed when it comes to utility bills, groceries, or supporting an out-of-work spouse.

Yet, it is the complete lack of entitlement reform, or even a discussion of Social Security retirement age adjustment or means testing for Medicare, that makes the sacrifice workers are now making an even more bitter pill to swallow.

Absent reform, the new revenues are essentially futile – dumped into programs that are bound to collapse under their own weight, and unlikely to do much good for those sacrificing their hard-earned money right now.

In fiscal year 2012 alone, Social Security spending totaled an incredible $773 billion, almost 5 percent of the nation’s GDP.

Using Congressional Budget Office (CBO) numbers, the Heritage Foundation explains just how dire the issue is:

“In 2011, Social Security incurred a $45 billion deficit. According to the 2012 trustees report, the expected average annual gap between Social Security spending and the program’s payroll tax revenue is $66 billion between 2012 and 2018.”

When revenues taken in cannot possibly cover the growing expenditures of the program, Americans who have worked and paid into the system could be left out in the cold. The CBO warned in October:

By 2030, Social Security outlays will be about 6 percent of gross domestic product and will exceed dedicated tax revenues by about 20 percent. As a result, under current law, resources available to the Social Security program will become insufficient to pay full benefits in about 20 years.”

Reforming Social Security is something that makes lawmakers tremble, but it is absolutely vital. Fortunately, creative ideas for reducing costs and expanding choice for prospective retirees are being offered by some leaders in Congress. In the House, Paul Ryan’s proposal would enact the following reforms:

  • Preserves the existing Social Security program for those 55 or older.
  • Offers workers under 55 the option of investing over one third of their current Social Security taxes into personal retirement accounts, similar to the Thrift Savings Plan available to Federal employees. Includes a property right so they can pass on these assets to their heirs, and a guarantee that individuals will not lose a dollar they contribute to their accounts, even after inflation.
  • Makes the program permanently solvent – according to the Congressional Budget Office [CBO] – by combining a more realistic measure of growth in Social Security’s initial benefits, with an eventual modernization of the retirement age.

In the Senate, Sens. Rand Paul (KY), Mike Lee (Utah), and Lindsay Graham (SC) have brought forth the Social Security Solvency and Sustainability Act, which they assert could create a solvent social security system by lowering benefits for those with higher incomes, and gradually increasing the retirement age, among other initiatives.

What simply cannot continue, is forcing taxpayers to throw their earnings away into programs politicians refuse to properly manage, when they could do better saving and investing on their own.

In the 133th Congress, it will be imperative that lawmakers put in the time to fix Social Security so working men and women have a fighting chance to get back the money which gets taken out of their paychecks every week.

 


 

Comment on this blog

Nickname
Comment
Enter this word:

User Comments

Submitted by travelman at: July 24, 2013
Simple solution to this is to bring jobs and companies back the America. Even if they paid just a little tax the workers would contribute more into the tax coffers and into Social security programs. A tax on imports would solve the problem to the failed Nafta and the like. It was a terrible idea that greed pushed thru at the cost of the gnp on the us. The bottom like is all that is understood in business now and taxing imports would stop the flight and bring companies back. The US has the most productive workers in the world

Submitted by sfgsdag at: February 16, 2013
http://www.coachoutletonlinexusa.com/ Coach Outlet Online Coach Outlet
http://www.shopcoachfactory.com/ shop.coachfactory.com coachfactory.com/shop Coach Store Online
http://www.michaelkorsooutlet.com/ Michael Kors Outlet Michael Kors Outlet Online
http://www.guccishoesinuk.com/ Gucci Shoes UK Gucci Shoes Outlet

Submitted by Jofus at: January 14, 2013
I disagree with your views on social security, it should be left as is. The consentration on the eliminating of entitlements should start with the outlawing the Senate using the Social Security money for any project that does not benefit retirees, which is the way it was set up to do. Next, it would be nice to eliminat the money being used to subliment the movie industry. After that is done a motion should be entertained to stop funding the UN which has turned out to be just an forum to denounce the United States and to try and enact laws that undermine our Constitution.