America's independent, non-partisan advocate for overburdened taxpayers.


Blog Contributors

Government Bytes

The Late Edition: October 17, 2013
Posted By: Curtis Kalin - 10/17/13

Today’s Post-‘Shutdown’ Taxpayer News!

The ‘less than 1 percent’: A study published in The Hill today shows that the dysfunctional Obamacare website has only enrolled 36,000 people out of over 9 million visitors during the first two weeks. Web traffic to the site is also plummeted 88 percent.

Duplicate lines: In an effort to provide high speed internet access to Colorado schools, the federal government authorized the laying of 32 miles of fiber optic cable lines right next to two commercial lines already feeding schools in Colorado. The cost of this duplication is around one million dollars. Read more at FedScoop.

High speed scheme: The latest filing on California’s $9 billion bullet train reveals the project remains financially unrealistic. A Superior Court judge had previously charged the High Speed Rail Authority with failing to meet spending limits set out in the 2008 bond measure approving the system. More details at the Riverside Press Enterprise.

0 Comments | Post a Comment | Sign up for NTU Action Alerts

Booker's & Lonegan's Proposals in NJ Senate Race
Posted By: Dan Barrett - 10/16/13

On Monday, NTU Foundation released a line-by-line study of what Newark Mayor Cory Booker and former Bogota Mayor Steve Lonegan would support if elected as Senator of New Jersey. We found that, of the policies we were able to quantify and score, Mayor Booker would increase spending by $33 billion and former Mayor Lonegan would decrease the federal budget by $68 billion. However, that's not the whole story. Both candidates had large holes in their agendas by either offering proposals that were too vague to be matched with current legislation or CBO cost estimates or they failed to even address an issue category (both said nothing regarding changing veterans programs).

What you should take away from this study: While it appears that Booker would grow the federal government and Lonegan would shrink it, both needed to offer taxpayers more information and details on exactly what they would do. This is something that plagues many campaigns and races, be it Senate races in 2010 or the 2012 GOP primaries. Both candidates touted themselves as the best choice for New Jersey and for improving the lives of Americans but neither laid out how they would accomplish such goals.

What you should espeically pay attention to: The largest proposal of each candidate. Booker would seek to pass comprehensive immigration reform legislation that has already worked its way through the Senate. The bill would increase spending by $20.2 billion each year and, similar to previously introduced measures, would increase border security spending and remake the immigration process. Lonegan has pledged to repeal the Affordable Care Act, which NTUF found would result in a $63.9 billion spending decrease each year.

Check out the breakdown of each policy categories below and the infographics of both Booker and Lonegan.

Break Down of Proposed Spending by the Two New Jersey Senatorial Frontrunners
(in millions of dollars and annualized)
Proposal Category
Economy, Transportation, and Infrastructure
Education, Science, and Research
Energy, Agriculture, and the Environment
Government Reform
Health Care
Homeland Security and Law Enforcement
National Defense and International Relations
Source: NTUF BillTally System
0 Comments | Post a Comment | Sign up for NTU Action Alerts

The Late Edition: October 16, 2013
Posted By: Curtis Kalin - 10/16/13

Government ‘Shutdown’: Day 16

Toll hunt: The Texas Department of Transportation is releasing the names of almost 28,000 violators of the state’s highway tolls. The move comes as the state attempts to gain back nearly $27 million in lost revenue.  Read more at KWTX.

Insurance overpay: Fluctuations have been found in the insurance plans for Memphis city and county government employees. Memphis city council chair Edmund Ford, Jr. reported that due to the area’s multiple insurers, the cost of employee insurance is $58 million. If all government employees were on a single plan, the cost would be significantly less. More at WMCTV.

Quadruple contracts: The Government Accountability Office recently reported the Department of Health and Human Services had four “potentially duplicative investments” in enterprise security systems costing taxpayers over $256 million.  The department has said they will look into the matter. Read more at FedScoop.

0 Comments | Post a Comment | Sign up for NTU Action Alerts

Infographic: New Jersey Senate Candidate Proposals
Posted By: Dan Barrett - 10/14/13

Today, NTU Foundation released its analysis of the two frontrunners' proposals in the New Jersey Senate race. Highlighting how Cory Booker and Steve Lonegan would change the federal budget, NTUF offers a wealth of information:

0 Comments | Post a Comment | Sign up for NTU Action Alerts

Top 10 Reasons the Sequester is a Success
Posted By: Nan Swift - 10/14/13

The Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA) was a law passed by Congress and President Obama during tense negotiations over the “debt ceiling.”  The intent of the law was to provide fiscal discipline and reduce the long-term debt.  One of the most important things the BCA did was to create discretionary spending caps to reduce the amount of money Congress can expend.  When Congress can’t meet these caps, a mechanism called the “sequester” automatically reduces discretionary spending in an across-the-board fashion. While far from perfect policy, the BCA and sequester are important tools to rein in Washington’s out-of-control spending.

Here are 10 reasons why:

1. Spending is falling: Spending is on track to fall below $3.45 trillion by the end of FY13. This is the first time, since the end of the Korean War, federal expenditures have fallen two years in a row. 
2. The deficit is shrinking: The deficit is expected to continue to drop through 2015 and is already down from a high of 10.2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2009 to 4 percent this year.
3. The sequester was NOT the crisis its critics predicted:  Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood feared chaos at airports due to Federal Aviation Administration cuts, but post-sequester, the agency’s budget is still larger than it was in 2008. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said that the sequester would result in mass layoffs of teachers, which has proven false.
4. The sequester does NOT put our national security at risk: The reduction in defense spending under the BCA is roughly 10 percent, which brings spending to about the same level it was under President George W. Bush in 2006.
5. Spending restraint can get our debt under control:  According to the Congressional Budget Office, if we could hold federal spending steady at $3.5 trillion we should be able to balance the budget by 2016.

6. The sequester helped to put the brakes on Washington’s out of control spending: In 2009, total federal spending reached over a quarter of GDP; in 2013 that fell to 21.5 percent. “Discretionary”(i.e., annually appropriated non-entitlement )spending, which sequestration primarily affects has shrunk by 10 percent since 2011 – and the sky hasn’t fallen.
7. The sequester is helping to eliminate wasteful spending: When forced to reexamine their budgets, many agencies found savings after all. The Department of Defense (DOD) found $1 billion in savings from reduced transportation costs and saved another $9.6 billion in reprogramming requests, delayed contracts, and reduced costs in another 200 programs. And there’s still overcapacity that costs taxpayers billions.
8. In the long run, the sequester can help the economy: The CBO states that “if the spending reductions under current law were reversed, that policy would lead to greater federal debt, which would eventually reduce the nation’s output and income below what would occur under current law.”
9. The sequester may be helping the stock market: Though many predicted stocks would tumble when the sequester took effect, the stock market has hit record highs this year. Though this is the result of a combination of factors, one major factor is that markets recognize that the U.S. is dealing with our outsized debt problem, making us an attractive investment.
10. The sequester does what Washington can’t:  The BCA’s sequester was intended to be a line in the sand that Congress would never dream of crossing. However, all other attempts to get spending under control failed. For decades, Washington has repeatedly given in to its worst instincts to increase spending and grown the size of government. Without the  sequester the overspending would never stop.

It’s important to remember though, that the sequester is only the first step toward getting our fiscal house in order. Larger bills loom on the horizon in the form of mandatory entitlement spending that threatens to bury our nation in debt. That’s why it’s so essential that we make the tough choices now, before the debt becomes unmanageable. There’s still a lot of work to do, but we must start by urging Washington to “Keep the Caps!”

To learn more about this important issue and take action, visit

0 Comments | Post a Comment | Sign up for NTU Action Alerts

NJ Senate Race: Booker, Lonegan Separated by $101 Billion
Posted By: Michael Tasselmyer - 10/14/13

Tab Insert

On Wednesday, New Jerseyans will vote in a special election to decide who will replace outgoing U.S. Senator Jeffrey Chiesa, a Republican and former state attorney general who was appointed by Governor Chris Christie to fill the seat vacated after Frank Lautenberg's death in June. Ahead of the election, National Taxpayers Union Foundation has released its line-by-line analysis of the proposals made by the leading candidates: former Newark mayor Cory Booker, who won the Democratic nomination in August, and his Republican challenger Steve Lonegan, the former mayor of Bogota.

During any election cycle, candidates propose and debate a variety of policies, which can give voters some insight into how they would spend (or save) the tax dollars they send to Washington. Unfortunately for taxpayers, it can be difficult to translate these proposals into specific dollar figures. Using data and methodology from the BillTally project, NTUF has analyzed the campaign promises of would-be Senators and Representatives since 2000 in order to make the budgetary implications of their agendas clearer for interested voters.

For the New Jersey election, NTUF sifted through each candidate's official campaign materials, public statements, and media appearances in order to determine which of their proposals could affect federal spending.

  • Lonegan's agenda included two items that would decrease federal spending and ten that carried unknown costs. Mayor Booker has offered more in the way of both detail and volume of proposals: of the 58 that NTUF determined would have some budgetary effect, 20 would increase federal spending.
  • On net, Booker's proposals could increase federal spending by $33 billion per year, while Lonegan's could save almost $68.2 billion per year.
  • That difference amounts to nearly $101 billion per year, roughly 2.8% of the Congressional Budget Office's projected federal outlays for Fiscal Year 2014.

For links to analyses of each candidate's proposals, as well as a number of summary graphs and other information on the studies, check out today's special edition of the Taxpayer's Tab online here.

0 Comments | Post a Comment | Sign up for NTU Action Alerts

Keep the Caps: New Orleans – Thursday, October 17
Posted By: Lee Schalk - 10/11/13

That’s right, NTU is headed to New Orleans for another Keep the Caps event!


After a successful luncheon and protest in Little Rock, Arkansas, we’re excited to be partnering with our Louisiana friends from The Hayride blog and American Voice PAC next week to spread the word about Washington’s spending problem.

Here’s the plan:

We will gather outside Ernst Cafe at 3:30pm and walk four blocks toward Senator Landrieu's New Orleans office for a rally and protest. Shortly after, we will head back to Ernst Cafe for free food, beverages, giveaways, and more.

Our message? It’s past time to get a grip on out-of-control national debt and spending.

Just two years after creating common-sense, bipartisan caps on federal spending, some politicians in Washington, including Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu, are trying to change the law and undo these sensible, bipartisan caps so they can continue to play games with your tax dollars. 

The modest spending restraint of 3 cents on the dollar, imposed by the Budget Control Act of 2011, is an important step in reining in our nation's out of control spending. So far, the sequester has been a success, with federal expenditures falling two years in a row – the first time since the end of the Korean War. 

On October 17, Louisianans have an opportunity to make their voices heard. Let's tell Senator Landrieu, President Obama, and the rest of Washington to Keep the Caps!

Be sure to grab your free ticket and RSVP by clicking HERE. Tell your friends, and we’ll see you Thursday!

0 Comments | Post a Comment | Sign up for NTU Action Alerts

The Late Edition: October 10, 2013
Posted By: Curtis Kalin - 10/10/13

Government ‘Shutdown’: Day 10

Website waste: The now infamous and floundering government website for Obamacare cost taxpayers over $634 million to create.  Despite knowing the October 1st deadline was coming for months, the site has been marred by poorly written code, glitches, and crashes.  Read more at Digital Trends.

Overbuilt Courts: A new Government Accountability Office report reveals that most federal courthouses built from 2000-2010 were built larger than Congress authorized.  The GAO found 3.56 million square feet of unneeded space costing taxpayers $835 million.  More details at USA Today.

Extravagant charges: The director of a Washington state educational group for low income children has been using taxpayer money to buy “expensive meals, unnecessary flights and a hotel stay in a presidential suite.”  To this day, Loueta Johnson remains on the job. KIMA TV has more details.

0 Comments | Post a Comment | Sign up for NTU Action Alerts

Vikings’ New Taxpayer Funded Stadium Already Hitting Fiscal Snags
Posted By: Curtis Kalin - 10/10/13

It’s the same old story, but taxpayers can’t seem to duck sports owners pining for new stadiums for their teams. Wealthy owners continue to use questionable tactics to extract tax money from fans for funding their “palaces.”

Their argument is always that a new stadium will increase tourism, which will increase sales, which will make everyone the requisite profit needed to pay back in spades the tax money spent up front. Unfortunately for the countless cities who have tried it, the bargain quickly turns into a boondoggle.

The state of Minnesota is the latest state to to push taxpayers into the publicly funded stadium trap. The state and the city of Minneapolis have thrown in almost $500 million, which is over 50 percent of the total cost of a stadium, for the Minnesota Vikings.

A previous NTUF study concluded that when public contributions represented over 50 percent of the costs, as is the case with the Vikings, the stadiums will be $65 million more expensive on average. Recently, the Vikings, the city, and their fans are finding NTUF’s finding to be all too real. 

Now, Team officials say they will have to cut out certain amenities from the proposed stadium just weeks before the groundbreaking. “We only have $975 million in the budget, and there’s only so many things you can get under that number,” said Vikings Vice President Lester Bagley. Among the casualties of the soaring costs is a parking garage and escalators. The team is also imposing $2,500 personal seat licenses for three fourths of the stadium’s seats. Is this an attempt to get more taxpayer money, or just part of accessing contingency funds? We’ll have to wait and see. Surely taxpayers who are shelling out more than half the stadium’s cost will not shed a tear over this “problem.”

As was the case in Detroit, St. Louis, Atlanta, and Washington; taxpayer funded sports stadiums don’t solve local woes. Owners and politicians pitch these stadiums as a ‘short term cost, long term profit’ venture for fans. But for taxpayers there’s ‘short term cost, long term debt’.

Sources:, Minneapolis Star Tribune, National Taxpayers Union Foundation

1 Comments | Post a Comment | Sign up for NTU Action Alerts

The Late Edition: October 9, 2013
Posted By: Curtis Kalin - 10/09/13

Government ‘Shutdown’: Day 9

‘Shutdown’ Theater: Fox News compiled a list of seven operations that were halted over the last nine days that saved practically no taxpayer funds. The list includes scenic spots on the sides of roads to jogging paths that happen to be on public land.

Obamacare phones: The state of Tennessee’s healthcare co-op is offering new enrollees in the healthcare exchanges free smart phones if they enroll. The plan originally received a federal grant of $73 million.  Read more at the Daily Caller.

Failure to report: One in five companies that received taxpayer assistance from the state of Wisconsin have not filed a report detailing where the money went. The reporting system was created in response to the revelation of $12 million of overdue loans from previous years.  Find out more details from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

0 Comments | Post a Comment | Sign up for NTU Action Alerts

Items 171 - 180 of 300  Previous11121314151617181920Next