America's independent, non-partisan advocate for overburdened taxpayers.


Blog Contributors

Brandon Arnold
Executive Vice President 

Dan Barrett
Research and Outreach Manager 

Melodie Bowler
Government Affairs Intern 

Demian Brady
Director of Research 

Christina DiSomma
Communications Intern 

Jihun Han
Communications Intern 

Timothy Howland
Creative Content Manager 

Samantha Jordan
Communications Intern 

Curtis Kalin
Communications Intern 

Ross Kaminsky
Blog Contributor 

David Keating
Blog Contributor 

Douglas Kellogg
Communications Manager 

Sharon Koss
Government Affairs Intern 

Michael Liguori
Government Affairs Intern 

Richard Lipman
Director of Development 

Joe Michalowski
Government Affairs Intern 

Diana Oprinescu
Communications Intern 

Austin Peters
Communications Intern 

Kristina Rasmussen
Blog Contributor 

Freddie Mac Asks for Another Bailout

Demian Brady
November 3, 2011

Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored mortgage enterprise that played a huge role in the housing-bubble and subsequent collapse, is now asking for more taxpayer funding to shore up its fiscal black hole. Despite being essentially taken over by federal regulators back in 2008, it continues to bleed cash and has requested $6 billion to cover recent losses. That is on top of other assistance it and its sibling Fannie Mae have received over the past few years. It is also just a small down payment on likely future bailouts:

Taxpayers have spent about $169 billion to rescue Fannie and Freddie, the most expensive bailout of the 2008 financial crisis. The government estimates it could cost up to $51 billion more to support the companies through 2014 after subtracting dividend payments.

The organizations and their huge portfolios represent a gargantuan risk to taxpayers. Unfortunately, reform efforts stalled after a series of proposals and hearings last spring. The Senate and the Administration should stop dithering, cap Fannie’s and Freddie’s ability to make new loans or take on new risky mortgages, and begin the process of winding down these government-sponsored enterprises that have distorted the housing market.


Comment on this blog

Enter this word:

User Comments

Submitted by mo at: November 3, 2011
I was under the impression that when Freddie went into conservator-ship, their assets were frozen so their only available option is the case of a short-fall is the line to the treasury. It seems it's not so much that Freddie is asking for it, but rather they're forced to do this right?