America's independent, non-partisan advocate for overburdened taxpayers.


Blog Contributors

Brandon Arnold
Executive Vice President 

Dan Barrett
Research and Outreach Manager 

Melodie Bowler
Government Affairs Intern 

Demian Brady
Director of Research 

Christina DiSomma
Communications Intern 

Jihun Han
Communications Intern 

Timothy Howland
Creative Content Manager 

Samantha Jordan
Communications Intern 

Curtis Kalin
Communications Intern 

Ross Kaminsky
Blog Contributor 

David Keating
Blog Contributor 

Douglas Kellogg
Communications Manager 

Sharon Koss
Government Affairs Intern 

Michael Liguori
Government Affairs Intern 

Richard Lipman
Director of Development 

Joe Michalowski
Government Affairs Intern 

Diana Oprinescu
Communications Intern 

Austin Peters
Communications Intern 

Kristina Rasmussen
Blog Contributor 

A Raisin in the Courts

Nan Swift
August 13, 2013

In early June the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision allowing a Constitutional challenge to a New Deal agriculture law go forward. The Washington Post tells the story of embattled raisin farmer, Marvin Horne, who is fighting for the right to keep what he grows:

Horne, a raisin farmer, has been breaking the law for 11 solid years. He now owes the U.S. government at least $650,000 in unpaid fines. And 1.2 million pounds of unpaid raisins, roughly equal to his entire harvest for four years.

His crime? Horne defied one of the strangest arms of the federal bureaucracy — a farm program created to solve a problem during the Truman administration, and never turned off.

He said no to the national raisin reserve.

The whole article is well worth your read.

What could compel growers to hand over the goods they have produced for little or no compensation?

 The Raisin Marketing Order.

One of 27 Marketing Orders enshrined in the Agricultural Marketing Agreement of 1937, this Depression-era law created a government-sponsored cartel that authorizes the “Raisin Administrative Committee” to seize a portion of the annual raisin crop in order to collectively influence supply, demand, and ultimately price. The Post goes on to offer a sanitized explanation:

It works like this: In a given year, the government may decide that farmers are growing more raisins than Americans will want to eat. That would cause supply to outstrip demand. Raisin prices would drop. And raisin farmers might go out of business.

To prevent that, the government does something drastic. It takes away a percentage of every farmer’s raisins. Often, without paying for them.

These seized raisins are put into a government-controlled “reserve” and kept off U.S. markets. In theory, that lowers the available supply of raisins and thereby increases the price for farmers’ raisin crops. Or, at least, the part of their crops that the government didn’t just take.

Where do those raisins go? The Raisin Administrative Committee stores them until such a time as it deems it permissible to let more raisins go on the market. Some are distributed for free to the School Lunch and other government programs, others are auctioned off. Profits are used to pay for storage and  “raisin promotion.” Farmers, who have been forced to turn over up to 47 percent of their crop in the past, get nothing or next to nothing in return. Nothing, that is, except the “privilege” to pursue their chosen vocation.

Adding insult to injury, because the Raisin Administrative Committee is enforced by the Department of Agriculture, ultimately taxpayers are paying for a program that increases prices for consumers and robs farmers.

Raisins are only one of many products that must adhere to the government’s price-fixing schemes. Marketing Orders are also in place for almonds, apricots, avocados, cherries, citrus fruits, cranberries, dates, grapes, hazelnuts, kiwifruit, nectarines, olives, onions, peaches, pears, pistachios, plums, potatoes, spearmint oil, tomatoes, and walnuts. And, lest we soon forget, dairy has its very own onerous marketing order that restricts supply and hikes prices for consumers.

While Mr. Horne’s case still has a long way to go as it once again wends its way through the lower courts, in the eyes of most taxpayers the outdated Marketing Orders should be a clear violation of the Takings Clause (the Fifth Amendment of the Bill of Rights). Rather than wait for the courts to unravel the red tape, Representative Trey Radel (R-FL) has introduced H.R. 2840, the Raisin Farmer Freedom Act, a bill that would exempt raisins from Agricultural Marketing Orders.

This is a good first step for raisin farmers eager to get out from under the oppressive Raisin Marketing Order. However, the bill falls short of what the agriculture industry needs to thrive in the 21st century. Instead of exempting only one crop, Congress should be working hard to dismantle the entire regime of Marketing Orders, a relic of outdated agriculture policies more akin to the U.S.S. R.’s top-down central planning.

The “invisible hand” described by Adam Smith is no less present in agriculture than it is in any other sector of the economy. Simply put, the government doesn’t have and never will have the information necessary to efficiently manage a market from on high. The fact that a “national raisin reserve” exists is proof positive of that fact.

Exempting raisin farmers from Marketing Orders would help Mr. Horne and his friends today. But Congress should go farther and level the playing field by completely eliminating these types of “admission fees” to the marketplace. Doing so would be a boon to both producers and consumers alike.


Comment on this blog

Enter this word:

User Comments

Submitted by jassica at: August 28, 2014
If you have erection problems, a vasodilator can help you achieve a stronger erectile, but you really need prescription medicine to have a significant impact. If size is what you are looking for, pills will do nothing, unfortunately. penis enlargement pills

Submitted by jassica at: August 22, 2014
The 2010 Honda Civic is basically unchanged from last year's model. With a well built interior, available coupe body style, good fuel economy, and a wide variety of power trains buyers are sure to find something that fits their lifestyle. civic sports

Submitted by jassica at: August 22, 2014
Summit NJ Real Estate is not only a wise investment, but a great opportunity to be involved in the growth of a thriving city in northwestern New Jersey. creative education summit

Submitted by jassica at: August 22, 2014
I don't understand this, and I wouldn't be so arrogant as to even try - not unless I choose to participate in that kind of journalism, which I have no intention of doing. Quite simply, it's not my calling. ormiston education

Submitted by jassica at: August 22, 2014
When it comes to finding the right infertility counselor it can be tough but as soon as you find the correct person you will feel very energized and excited of all the new things you have learned. counseling education

Submitted by jassica at: August 22, 2014
Home Based Businesses and Network Marketing are two of the hottest trends in the market place today. In order to achieve success in both, a person must have desire, belief and know you deserve to be successful. capital business net work

Submitted by Anonymous at: August 18, 2014
Only 1 specific wide-spread method regarding risk-free sheltering endurable favorite argumentative dissertation drugs five-paragraph operations. Program Design

Submitted by Anonymous at: August 16, 2014
It is really what I wanted to see hope in future you will continue for sharing such a excellent post. learn how to play poker

Submitted by dereck at: August 14, 2014
The techniques mentioned in this article from now on addition traffic by you own network site are genuinely fine thanks for such pleasant story. the venus factor reviews

Submitted by clare at: August 21, 2013
The same goes for sugar beets, contracted grown acreage only, pears,peaches need to be contracted with the Fruit Growers and etc. These laws should be abolished NOW,

Submitted by voluntaryist at: August 21, 2013
I am confused. Is "The Ag. Marketing Agreement" a law or an executive order? Either way it is unConstitutional and should be abolished. If the SCOTUS fails, by commission or omission, they should be removed. Actually, that ship has sailed. No decision is too outrageous, too immoral, too invasive, or too unConstitutional to cause public outrage. And the executive and legislative branch are just as bad. After 200+ years the lesson is clear: "limited govt." is an oxymoron.

Submitted by Jojo at: August 21, 2013
So what are you or anyone doing about this issue? When are we going to actually start to correct things, level the playing field, get rid of laws and policy that have long gone past what they were intended to help.?