America's independent, non-partisan advocate for overburdened taxpayers.


Blog Contributors

Brandon Arnold
Executive Vice President 

Dan Barrett
Research and Outreach Manager 

Melodie Bowler
Government Affairs Intern 

Demian Brady
Director of Research 

Christina DiSomma
Communications Intern 

Jihun Han
Communications Intern 

Timothy Howland
Creative Content Manager 

Samantha Jordan
Communications Intern 

Curtis Kalin
Communications Intern 

Ross Kaminsky
Blog Contributor 

David Keating
Blog Contributor 

Douglas Kellogg
Communications Manager 

Sharon Koss
Government Affairs Intern 

Michael Liguori
Government Affairs Intern 

Richard Lipman
Director of Development 

Joe Michalowski
Government Affairs Intern 

Diana Oprinescu
Communications Intern 

Austin Peters
Communications Intern 

Kristina Rasmussen
Blog Contributor 

What Savings? Obamacare & the Deficit

Christina DiSomma
July 16, 2013

Poor Charlie Brown. Lucy’s snatched the football away again - except this time, the football is Obamacare’s “deficit savings” and the American taxpayer is the one knocked flat on the ground.

Obamacare was sold on the premise that it would reduce the deficit.  The Congressional Budget Office reported reductions of $130 billion in the first decade after passage, and $1.2 trillion in the second. President Obama even went so far as to say that the legislation was “the most significant effort to reduce the deficit since the Balanced Budget Act in the 1990s.”

Since the passage of the act, however, we’ve seen development after development completely disintegrate what many already viewed as misleading claims of budget relief.

As noted, the bill was written to hide the costs beneath inflated “savings,” and higher insurance premiums and poor actuarial work would take their toll as well. The Heritage Foundation also tore the claims to pieces, pointing out that legislators ignored the expensive “doc fix,” and set the terms of several taxes and subsidies to falsely boost the idea of deficit reduction.

Now, after three years, the story of the “debt reducing” parts of the Affordable Care Act likely has the initial skeptics echoing Jurassic Park’s Ian Malcolm in saying, “Boy do I hate being right all the time.”

The most blatant attempt to cover “Obamacare’s” new spending was the CLASS Act. It offered, for what seemed like a reasonable premium, average long-term insurance benefits of at least $50 per day. Originally, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that CLASS could cut the deficit by $70 million. Unfortunately, the program itself was unworkable from the get-go.

The CBO couldn’t even effectively measure the program, because no benefits were scheduled for distribution until at least five years after initial enrollment. CBO scores only cover the ten-year span after a law is enacted - so for the first half of the study, the “cost” of the program was effectively zero. Naturally, this bit of budget wonk-ery quickly caught up to the administrators of the program. As NTU noted, “an ‘insurance death spiral’ was inevitable – high premiums and a short vesting period would discourage all but the sickest Americans from signing up...this would drive premiums even higher, further discouraging the young, healthy people needed to keep costs manageable.”

The Department of Health and Human Services “realized” this before long as well, and CLASS was abandoned in October 2011 having done its main job of reducing the Affordable Care Acts CBO score.

The Employer Mandate is the most recent piece of “Obamacare’s” deficit reduction bundle to bite the dust. One of the most crucial financial supports of the Affordable Care Act, the mandate requires every employer with more than 50 employees to provide health insurance or pay a hefty penalty. A non-insurance providing company will owe $2,000 for each employee ineligible for low-income exchanges, and $3,000 for each employee eligible for the exchanges. The penalties are intended to fund the exchanges themselves, and tax credits for insurance purchase. However, the Obama administration recently delayed the mandate, extending the deadline for employer insurance coverage to 2015.

This is a budget-buster in more than one way: not only will the administration lose out on $10 billion in potential penalties in the upcoming year, but the infamous individual mandate was not tied to the employer one. This is creating an incentive for companies to dump employee insurance ahead of schedule, avoiding both the cost of health insurance and the first year’s fees. However, those unlucky employees will still be bound by the individual mandate, and many will likely be forced onto government exchanges. If Congress doesn’t act to delay the individual mandate as well, the costs could spiral much higher, both for the consumer and for Obamacare.

Finally, inefficient insurance exchanges threaten to chew up any “savings” created by other programs, and then some. Originally, wage and income data from the IRS was supposed to be used to determine eligibility for exchange subsidies. The problem is, the information needed didn’t (and still doesn’t) exist in a “real time” database. Such a collection of information would be costly and time-consuming to create, not to mention the requirements of keeping such a database secure.

Eventually, the administration admitted defeat, and announced that they would be offering subsidies based on self-reporting: basically, “the honor system.” Given the government can only impose penalties for fraud on your tax refund, the honor system is a particularly expensive way to conduct business. If you don’t collect a refund, no penalties will be imposed.

“Obamacare’s” supporters used “deficit reduction” as a major plank in arguing for passage of the law. As many critics predicted, though, in actual practice they’re limited by structural deficiency and an inability to respond efficiently to market forces. Now, the budget-busting reality of his health care reform boondoggle should be clear to all, but sometimes it seems only those paying the bills truly notice.


Comment on this blog

Enter this word:

User Comments

Submitted by BonneiBernnet at: August 22, 2014
It needs new and alternative energy in the future. Analysts have predicted that current energy is only survive in the next decade.

Submitted by houston wedding videographer at: August 22, 2014
We are wedding videography company located in Houston, TX but are available for destination weddings and worldwide travel. houston wedding videographer

Submitted by AmosWojcik at: August 20, 2014
The world economy is going to be better and I believe the U.S. government will be stronger after the great recession. All countries over the world will survive together with the U.S.goverment. mobilespy

Submitted by leitz65 at: July 26, 2013
Direct quote from one of those who had input into Obamacare - and this guy is a doctor - Raum Emmanuels brother: "Vague promises of savings from cutting waste, enhancing prevention and wellness, installing electronic medical records and improving quality are merely 'lipstick' cost control, more for show and public relations than for true change. Savings will require changing how doctors think about their patients. Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath too seriously, as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others." this is the same guy who puts social value on the age of the patient - pre educated (infant) not very valuable because not much investment; 25 to 35 very valuable because of investment and they are at the age of working (tax income); 65 not very valuable because they have reached the end of usefullness (and may have an estate that should go to the government coffers).

Submitted by Florida Jim at: July 25, 2013
Obama care was a scam from the beginning with false claims of reducing debt when every study showed it massively increased debt and Obama would then revise the numbers to make it appear a reduction. As the bill is finally being read and studied it is all a fraud a massive increase in debt to satisfy Obama ego and be able to look at the Clinton's and say "I got a healthcare bill and you did not" it is all ego and fraud and Obama should be impeached for his never ending lies.

Submitted by Jacksonia at: July 24, 2013
BFD....why the surprise and "OH MY"? Yes it's all f'ed up but that's because the GOP and Ins. companies planned it that way and manipulated all the hidden changes. Wht we all need is a single payer system and be done with it. Why can other countries be doing it successfully and we are not? Money profits and American ego. Take the best idea where ever it comes from. It ain't com'in from the GOP. They'd have us all lay down and die. This i9s a rich man's country with no room for those who made this country great. Why is there no more middle class? OFF WITH THEIR HEADS......

Submitted by Dman10 at: July 24, 2013
I for one am so glad the real truth is coming out. this was a sham and a bad deal for everyone that will be affected by it.

Submitted by Bushwacker at: July 24, 2013
Truth, truth, truth. Thanks so much for this confirmation in ALL that we have believed about this bill's early indoctrination.

Submitted by Leitz65 at: July 24, 2013
chetwalker25 - lets get real here. It was fraud when the top three politians (Obama, Pelosi and Reid)sold it, it was fraud when the rest of the Lemmings bought it; why would you expect it to get any better with time?

Submitted by chetwalker25 at: July 24, 2013
Let's give it some time. There's fraud in Medicare, but no one is calling for cancellation.

Submitted by BigO at: July 24, 2013
What the @#$% just happened! I think that's what Pelosi, Reid and Obama are asking right now. What a group of nit wits and they are leaders Hog wash!! Where is the "tar and feathers" and don't forget the rail!

Submitted by Newspooner at: July 24, 2013
Communism by any other name is still communism.