Taxpayers Tab: H.R. 402, National Infrastructure Development Bank Act 2011

Vol. 2 Issue 9, March 24, 2011

We Want You!

NTUF is looking for late spring and summer associate policy analysts to participate in our internship program. Associates assist with BillTally research and other policy projects. Academic credit is possible. Email questions to ntuf@ntu.org. To apply visit our internship page. Join us and help keep a tab on Congress!

Most Expensive Bill of the Week

The Bill: H.R. 402, National Infrastructure Development Bank Act 2011

Annualized Cost: $5 billion ($25 billion over five years)

Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro (CT-3) introduced H.R. 402 to establish a public bank, which "would supplement other federal infrastructure programs, and provide investment opportunities to create jobs, spur economic growth, and help build an infrastructure for the future." As a wholly-owned government corporation, such as the housing entity Fannie Mae, the bank's financing would be backed by the full faith and credit of the US government.

The National Infrastructure Development Bank would issue bonds to eligible lenders, including regional, state, and local entities, as well as commercial banks. Funds would be directed to transportation, environmental, energy, and telecommunications projects, each requiring a different set of standards to be considered by the four committees within the bank.

The bill authorizes $5 billion for each of the next five years. Funds would serve as the base capital from which the bank would issue bonds. In the President's budget proposal, a similar bank was outlined at the same $5 billion annual cost but instead over six years.

Least Expensive Bill of the Week

The Bill: H.R. 413, Defense and Deficit Reduction Act

Annualized Savings: -$36.4 billion (first-year savings)

By introducing the Defense and Deficit Reduction Act, Congressman Pete Stark (CA-13) proposes to "have a meaningful effect on the deficit" by cutting the military's budget. H.R. 413 would make across-the-board cuts to defense appropriations in FY 2011 but would exclude military personnel pay and benefits as well as counter-drug activities carried out by the Defense Department.

In a press release issued by Congressman Stark's office, the bill would return Department of Defense military spending to 2008 levels or, "saving $182 billion" over five years. NTUF took only the first year's savings into account because the bill cuts the budget in FY 2011 to 2008 levels and freezes it for the next four years. The savings would be used to reduce the deficit.

Most Friended

The Bill: H.R. 471/S. 206, Scholarships for Opportunity and Results (SOAR) Act

Annualized Cost: $60 million ($300 million over five years)

Number of Cosponsors: 50 Congressmen and 6 Senators

The DC Opportunity Scholarship Program (DCOSP) was a school voucher initiative created in 2004. As the first federally-funded program of its type, 2,000 children from low income families in the Washington, DC area were awarded funds to help offset costs associated with enrollment at private schools. Individual scholarships of up to $7,500 were awarded until a 2009 budget measure defunded the program.

House Speaker John Boehner (OH-8) and Senator Joe Lieberman (CT) introduced the SOAR Act to reauthorize the DCOSP from FY 2012 to 2016. Senator Lieberman said, "without a quality education, there is no equal opportunity. … This legislation would fulfill the fundamental civil rights of children in DC to get the best educations they can. There is no down side."

According to the Congressional Budget Office, annual costs would include $20 million to fund DCOSP plus $40 million to fund improvement projects for DC public and charter schools. H.R. 471 would not impose any extra costs or mandates on state or local governments or private entities.

Cosponsors include one Democrat and 49 Republicans in the House. In the Senate, one Democrat and five Republicans support S. 206.

Support NTUF

The National Taxpayers Union Foundation is able to produce timely reports and analysis for policymakers and taxpayers with the help and support of foundations, small businesses, and Americans who wish to stay informed of their government's spending. With donations from Tab subscribers and members, NTUF will be able to continue to simplify important entitlement reform plans, examine budgets, and score legislation. Please consider making a tax-free contribution to NTUF.

The Wildcard

The Bill: H.R. 820/S. 393, Prescribe A Book Act

Annualized Cost: $15 million (first year cost)

H.R. 820 and S. 393, sponsored by Congressman Donald Payne (NJ-10) and Senator Jack Reed (RI) respectively, would establish national Pediatric Early Literacy Programs to award grants to encourage health care providers to get involved in early reading efforts. Private nonprofit organizations and public agencies would be eligible for grants if their programs give priority to children in poverty, without medical insurance, in a State Medicaid program, living in rural areas, with immigrant parents, and/or children with limited access to libraries.

The Act creates a 3-part program model. Health care workers would offer recommendations to parents to read to their children, health care providers would give children between the ages of six months and five years a book to keep, and volunteers would read aloud to children in waiting areas.

About NTUF

The National Taxpayers Union Foundation is a research and educational organization dedicated solely to helping citizens of all generations understand how tax policies, spending programs, and regulations at all levels affect them now and in the future. Through NTUF's timely information, analysis, and commentary, we're empowering citizens to actively engage in the fiscal policy debate and hold public officials accountable every day.

NTUF is a 501(c)(3) research and education organization. Donations are deductible for personal income tax purposes. Please make a donation today to help further NTUF's mission of research and education!

This information is for educational purposes only and is not intended to aid or hinder the passage of any legislation or as a comment on any Member's fitness to serve.