Press Releases
Printable Version |
Email to a friend
For Immediate Release Oct 7, 2004 For Further Information, Contact: Peter J. Sepp, Demian Brady, Annie Patnaude, (703) 683-5700Study: Nearly 10 Years After GOP Takeover, Trend to Spend Still Shaping Congressional Agendas (Alexandria, VA) -- Almost a decade has passed since
the political revolution that
changed party control of Congress, but what happened to the fiscal revolution that was supposed
to follow? The latest BillTally
study released today from the National Taxpayers Union Foundation (NTUF)
offers surprising data showing how the prospects for smaller government
went from promising, to poor, to uncertain today.
Created
in 1991, BillTally computes a net annual agenda for each Member of Congress
based on sponsorship and cosponsorship of pending legislation (whose costs
are estimated by using third-party sources or neutral data). The study
facilitates a unique look at the fiscal behavior of lawmakers, free from
the influence of committees, party leaders, and rules surrounding floor
votes. Among NTUF's findings:
-
During the first 18 months of the current Congress,
57 Representatives and 31 Senators could not find a single piece of spending
reduction legislation to support. Ginny Brown-Waite (R-FL) sponsored
or cosponsored the most spending cuts (11) in the House, while Russ Feingold
(D-WI) backed the largest number of spending-reduction bills (10) in
the Senate. Leading the House for support of spending increases was Martin Frost (D-TX),
with 273 bills. Hillary
Clinton (D-NY) topped the Senate by sponsoring or cosponsoring 174 spending-hike
bills.
-
Since the early years of the Republican accession
to leadership, the typical GOP lawmaker's yearly spending agenda has
trended upward, reaching record highs in this Congress ($35.6 billion
in the House and $32.7 billion in the Senate). Even so, the typical House
Democrat backed legislation that would increase federal outlays by a
net of $509.4 billion, while the typical Senate Democrat's net annual
agenda was +$195.8 billion.
-
Within
the first 18 months of the 108th Congress, a total of
1,147 House bills and 871 Senate bills were identified as having
a fiscal impact
of at least $1 million. Spending-hike bills outnumbered spending
cuts by an overall ratio of 25.5 to 1
-
Freshman
lawmakers in both parties proposed less spending than their longer-serving
colleagues (47 percent less in the House and 76 percent less in the Senate).
-
The
20 Senators at the top of Roll Call newspaper's
list for greatest personal wealth
called for a 77 percent bigger boost in federal budget outlays than the
average for their 80 remaining colleagues. In the House, however, the opposite
held true: the 20 richest Representatives sought federal spending increases
that were 73 percent smaller than their less-wealthy counterparts.
NTUF Senior Policy Analyst and study author
Demian Brady noted that "this trend to spend began long before September
11. Indeed, demands for spending on child care, welfare, and entitlements
far outpaced those for defense and homeland security." Nonetheless, BillTally
also provides a few indications that Members may be regaining an interest
in trimming the budget. Even as the number of spending increase bills
hit records, for the first time since the 103rd Congress, spending
cut bills in the House became more prevalent as well. This uptick
also occurred in the Senate, for the first time since the 104th Congress.
"Ten
years ago, record deficits spurred the movement toward proposals to cut
spending," Brady concluded. "Time will tell whether these signs become
a full-fledged trend. If they do not, the continued demand for increases
in the federal budget will endanger efforts to reform the Tax Code and
modernize Social Security, not to mention jeopardize vows by both Presidential
candidates to cut the deficit in half."
NTUF
is the research arm of the 350,000-member National Taxpayers Union. NTUF
Policy Paper 154, Ghosts of the Revolution, which includes individual
BillTally reports for each Representative and Senator, is available online
at www.ntu.org.
-30- Related Links: |
|
|