America's independent, non-partisan advocate for overburdened taxpayers.


Blog Contributors

Brandon Arnold
Executive Vice President 

Dan Barrett
Research and Outreach Manager 

Melodie Bowler
Government Affairs Intern 

Demian Brady
Director of Research 

Christina DiSomma
Communications Intern 

Jihun Han
Communications Intern 

Timothy Howland
Creative Content Manager 

Samantha Jordan
Communications Intern 

Curtis Kalin
Communications Intern 

Ross Kaminsky
Blog Contributor 

David Keating
Blog Contributor 

Douglas Kellogg
Communications Manager 

Sharon Koss
Government Affairs Intern 

Michael Liguori
Government Affairs Intern 

Richard Lipman
Director of Development 

Joe Michalowski
Government Affairs Intern 

Diana Oprinescu
Communications Intern 

Austin Peters
Communications Intern 

Kristina Rasmussen
Blog Contributor 

Michigan Voters to Decide on Supermajority Taxpayer Protection, Union Power, and More

Lee Schalk
November 2, 2012

Will voters impose additional limits on government in the Great Lakes State? Michiganders will answer that question and more when they weigh in on the state’s hefty issue slate this fall. A provision to give constitutional weight to government-sector union collective bargaining agreements and a referendum to expand powers for Emergency Managers, combined with a two-thirds majority protection for tax hikes to give Wolverine State voters the power to significantly impact Michigan’s direction.

Of prime significance for taxpayers, Michigan voters have a rare opportunity to pass a measure that would limit the ability of lawmakers to raise taxes. Proposal 5 would require that any future tax hike earns approval from two-thirds of the legislature. In conjunction with other mechanisms to limit tax increases in the state, this could pressure elected officials to close budget gaps with spending restraint instead of more tax increases. Supermajority thresholds like Proposal 5 have enjoyed widespread support in places like Washington and Oklahoma because they place reasonable barriers on the ability of governments to raise taxes.

Here are the most significant propositions for Michigan taxpayers according to NTU's 2012 Ballot Guide:

Proposal 1 is a referendum on a 2011 law, which expanded the powers of emergency managers in cities in financial turmoil. Emergency managers are appointed by the Governor and given the ability to recognize local governments and clean up financial problems. Supporters say that, while it’s not ideal, this may be the only way for some cities to avoid financial collapse.

Proposal 2 is the “Protect Our Jobs” Amendment, widely supported by union leaders in the State. It would give collective bargaining agreements the power of the Constitution.

As mentioned above, Proposal 5 would give taxpayers a proven protection from future tax hikes through a two-thirds “supermajority” in the Legislature or statewide vote.

Proposal 6 has garnered significant attention around the State. This measure would require voter approval for construction of any new bridge or tunnel from Michigan to Canada, projects that could involve government-issued debt or other taxpayer liabilities.

Stay tuned for more on the major state ballot initiatives this election season, and visit our 2012 Ballot Guide page HERE to find your state’s complete slate of propositions, questions, amendments and more.


Comment on this blog

Enter this word:

User Comments