Coalition to House: Oppose Protectionist Policies in FY17 DOD Appropriations

We, the undersigned organizations representing millions of taxpayers, urge all Representatives to support amendments that would strike anti-competitive provisions in H.R. 5293, the Fiscal Year 2017 Department of Defense (DOD) Appropriations Act.

  • Amendment #17 (8), sponsored by Representatives Huffman (D-CA) and McClintock (R-CA), would strike language in the underlying bill requiring the Air Force to use a domestically-produced energy-source as the base load energy for heating at the Kaiserslautern, Germany defense installations. The bill language is a slight modification of a decades-old earmark that was finally eliminated only last year. Past iterations even prevented upgrades of the boilers on several military bases, which could have taken advantage of alternative lower-cost energy sources, and required that the coal used be shipped from Pennsylvania.

Still, this requirement limits the Pentagon’s options and requires shipping an energy-input across the Atlantic, despite the availability of potentially competitive fuel sources from Germany or Poland. Any savings that could be achieved by finding a more local source for coal or upgrading the heating system to accommodate other fuel, are worth investigating.

  • Amendment #21 (29), sponsored by Representatives Sanford (R-SC), Brat (R-VA), and Hastings (D-FL), would preserve the cash voucher system currently used to allow new recruits to purchase their preferred running shoes. This would reverse the protectionist policy enshrined in both the House and Senate National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAA) for FY 17 that would require the Secretary of Defense to furnish athletic footwear that comply with the “Berry Amendment” (Section 2533a of Title 10 in the U.S. Code), which only the New Balance company can fulfill, restricting service peoples’ choices.

Without Congressional action to prevent the enactment of this cronyist measure, the “New Balance” provision could permanently expand the misguided Berry Amendment.

Doubling-down on outdated policies that limit competition and artificially prop up a favored industry or company impedes the Pentagon’s ability to pursue cost-savings and efficiency. Representatives should encourage open and fair competition to ensure that taxpayers – and the Pentagon – obtain the best value for their funding.

To that end, we urge all Representatives to vote “Yes” on amendments #17 and #21 to H.R. 5293.

Sincerely,

National Taxpayers Union
Campaign for Liberty
Center for Freedom and Prosperity
Coalition to Reduce Spending
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste
Heritage Action for America
Less Government
Niskanen Center
R Street Institute
Taxpayers for Common Sense
Taxpayers Protection Alliance